Enable javascript in your browser for better experience. Need to know to enable it? Go here.
本页面中的信息并不完全以您的首选语言展示,我们正在完善其他语言版本。想要以您的首选语言了解相关信息,可以点击这里下载PDF。
更新于 : Jan 31, 2011
不在本期内容中
这一条目不在当前版本的技术雷达中。如果它出现在最近几期中,那么它很有可能仍然具有相关参考价值。如果这一条目出现在更早的雷达中,那么它很有可能已经不再具有相关性,我们的评估将不再适用于当下。很遗憾我们没有足够的带宽来持续评估以往的雷达内容。 了解更多
Jan 2011
试验 ?
Functional languages have a wide range of practical uses, including simulation, computational fi nance, computational science, large scale data processing and parsing. These fields benefit from functional programming techniques that simplify concurrent execution and the expression of complex mathematical functions concisely. Functional programming requires a shift in thinking for enterprise developers experienced in object oriented development. Moving to an often terse syntax for solving complex problems may initially be intimidating to many. As with all forms of programming languages, syntax is just one aspect of the language itself. In functional programming another significant aspect is the use of common idioms. These idioms speed code comprehension and increase overall maintainability. This might not be news to all, but it is worth noting that dynamic languages are long ready for adoption and trial. Ruby, particularly when deployed on JRuby, is ready for adoption. Thoughtworks uses Ruby and JRuby extensively in both its Services and Product work. Groovy is ready for trial and could prove more accessible than Ruby/JRuby in a Java shop. For the right type of applications, Ruby, JRuby, and Groovy prove far more effective, expressive, and productive than Java and C#.
Aug 2010
试验 ?
Apr 2010
试验 ?
发布于 : Apr 29, 2010

下载 PDF

 

English | Español | Português | 中文

订阅技术雷达简报

 

立即订阅

查看存档并阅读往期内容