Enable javascript in your browser for better experience. Need to know to enable it? Go here.
更新于 : Apr 24, 2019
不在本期内容中
这一条目不在当前版本的技术雷达中。如果它出现在最近几期中,那么它很有可能仍然具有相关参考价值。如果这一条目出现在更早的雷达中,那么它很有可能已经不再具有相关性,我们的评估将不再适用于当下。很遗憾我们没有足够的带宽来持续评估以往的雷达内容。 了解更多
Apr 2019
试验 ?

We've talked about Reactor in the previous Radars. It has continued to gain traction in many of our projects. With the Spring ecosystem embracing Reactor, it has become the dominant implementation of Reactive Streams. Reactive systems come with improved scalability and resilience but with increased cost of debugging and a steeper learning curve. For those projects where this tradeoff is acceptable, Reactor has proven to be a good choice. Some of our projects have observed significant improvements in scalability once they moved to Reactor and the rest of the Reactive stack. With R2DBC we are starting to get reactive support for RDBMS drivers which addresses one of the weaknesses of reactive services.

May 2018
评估 ?

Reactor is a library for building non-blocking applications on the JVM — version 8 and above — based on the Reactive Streams specification. Reactive programming emphasizes moving from imperative logic to asynchronous, non-blocking and functional style code, especially when dealing with external resources. Reactor implements the reactive stream specification and provides two publisher APIs — Flux (0 to N elements) and Mono (0 or 1 element) — to effectively model push-based stream processing. Reactor project is well suited for microservices architecture and offers back pressure–ready network engines for HTTP, WebSockets, TCP and UDP traffic.

发布于 : May 15, 2018

下载 PDF

 

English | Español | Português | 中文

订阅技术雷达简报

 

立即订阅

查看存档并阅读往期内容