本页面中的信息并不完全以您的首选语言展示,我们正在完善其他语言版本。想要以您的首选语言了解相关信息,可以点击这里下载PDF。
更新于 : Jan 28, 2014
不在本期内容中
这一条目不在当前版本的技术雷达中。如果它出现在最近几期中,那么它很有可能仍然具有相关参考价值。如果这一条目出现在更早的雷达中,那么它很有可能已经不再具有相关性,我们的评估将不再适用于当下。很遗憾我们没有足够的带宽来持续评估以往的雷达内容。
了解更多
Jan 2014
采纳
For problems that fit the document database model, MongoDB is now the most popular choice. In addition to ease of use and a solid technical implementation, the community and ecosystem contributed to this success. We are aware of problems where teams were tempted by the popularity of MongoDB when a document database was not a good fit or they did not understand the inherent complexity. When used appropriately, however, MongoDB has proven itself on many projects.
May 2013
采纳
Oct 2012
试验
For problems that fit the document databases model, MongoDB provides easy programmability, a query interface, high availability with automated failover, and automated sharding capabilities. It allows for a smooth transition to NoSQL data stores from the RDBMS model, with the inclusion of familiar concepts, such as the ability to define indexes.
Aug 2010
试验
Document-oriented databases treat each record as a document with the ability to add any number of fields of arbitrary size. A relatively large amount of the attention that has been directed at document databases has landed on mongoDB, a highly scalable option with support for querying, indexing, replication and sharding. Beyond its enterprise feature set, its popularity is aided by its driver support for Java, Ruby, PHP, C#, Python and a number of other languages.
Apr 2010
试验
发布于 : Apr 29, 2010